Childhood in Multiple Languages: When Bilingualism Becomes a Metaphor
Keywords:
bilingualism, identity formation, multilingual childhoodAbstract
This paper advances the proposition that childhood bilingualism functions not merely as a psycholinguistic condition but as a metaphor through which children construct meaning about self, identity, and the social world. Drawing upon empirical research from developmental psychology, sociolinguistics, and educational studies, the paper demonstrates that bilingual children develop enhanced metaphorical competence, particularly in metaphor production, rooted in meta-metaphorical awareness and cognitive flexibility. Children actively construct their multilingual identities using four master metaphorical source domains: the natural world, artefact or tool, journey, and personification. These metaphors carry significant emotional valences, conceptualised as affective metaphorical load, which shapes psychological well-being and educational outcomes. The paper further distinguishes between code-switching as metaphor, which reifies language boundaries, and translanguaging as metonymy, which recognises holistic linguistic repertoires. Educational implications include explicit metaphor instruction across all of a child's languages, treatment of children's metaphorical productions as valuable data, examination of educators' own metaphorical framings, and selection of curricular materials that model positive, dynamic metaphors of bilingualism. By reconceptualising bilingualism as metaphor, the paper redirects attention from purely functional outcomes towards the experiential and symbolic dimensions of multilingual childhood, offering theoretical tools for research and practice in an increasingly globalised world.
References
Alipour, J., & Ranjbar, M. (2023). A metaphorical advantage for bilingual children? Understanding figurative meaning by L2 and L3 EFL learners. Journal of Child Language, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000065
Batoreo, H. (2018). Metaphorical competence in multilingual context of language acquisition and learning. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22, 534–556. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0024
Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099
De Houwer, A. (2020). Harmonious bilingual development: Young families’ well-being in language contact situations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(2), 206–221.
García-Mateus, S., & Palmer, D. (2017). Translanguaging pedagogies for positive identities in two-way dual language bilingual education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 16(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1329016
Gaskins, D., & Rundblad, G. (2023). Metaphor production in the bilingual acquisition of English and Polish. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162486
Grosjean, F. (2019). A journey in languages and cultures: The life of a bilingual. Oxford University Press.
Kaveh, Y., & Lenz, A. (2022). “I’m embarrassed and scared to speak a different language”: The complex language beliefs and emotions of bi/multilingual children of immigrants in monolingual U.S. schools. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45, 2683–2700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2062367
Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Logutenkova, O. (2024). The development of metaphorical competence in the process of teaching Russian to natural bilinguals. Science and School, 2, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2024-2-256-265
Magaña, D., & Ramos, L. (2022). Amplifying Latinx students’ voices about bilingual experiences: A critical metaphor analysis. Heritage Language Journal, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/15507076-bja10008
Martínez-Roldán, C., & Malavé, G. (2004). Language ideologies mediating literacy and identity in bilingual contexts. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798404044514
Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2015). Multilingual awareness and heritage language education: Children’s multimodal representations of their multilingualism. Language Awareness, 24(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1072208
Melo-Pfeifer, S., & Chik, A. (2020). Multimodal linguistic biographies of prospective foreign language teachers in Germany: Reconstructing beliefs about languages and multilingual language learning in initial teacher education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(4), 499–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1753748
Moses, L. (2023). Multilingual representation matters: An in-depth analysis of translanguaging in Dear Primo: A Letter to My Cousin. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 46(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-023-00042-6
Nair, R. (2022). Body of knowledge and knowledge of the body: The early development of metaphor in bilingual children. Language & Communication, 85, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.06.002
Negrette, G. (2022). Bilingual ways with words: Children’s identity enactment and negotiation in a dual language immersion class. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 23(5), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2025539
Senaydin, F., & Dikilitas, K. (2019). Exploring child bilingual identity in Turkish context: A single case study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1639130
Veliz, L., & Veliz-Campos, M. (2019). A socio-semiotic analysis of Latino migrants’ metaphorical conceptualizations of language learning. Journal of Latinos and Education, 21(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2019.1630285
Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EIRP Proceedings

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.