The Power of Emotions in the Era of Fake News
Keywords:
emotional resilience, media literacy, disinformation, false memories, post-truthAbstract
This article explores the role of emotions in shaping individuals’ vulnerability to fake news., affecting both the perception and the dissemination of false information, with particular attention paid to young audiences who grow up inside the digital attention economy. The study builds on research from the psychology of misinformation, dual-process cognitive theory, affective persuasion, the illusory truth effect, and recent neuroscientific findings about how the brain processes fabricated content; it also draws from media studies and post-truth theory. Methodologically, we conducted a narrative literature review and conceptual synthesis based on peer-reviewed international studies, meta-analyses, and neuroimaging research published between 2020 and 2025, including Romanian empirical contributions. The findings indicate that emotions act as central drivers of vulnerability to disinformation: they reduce critical reflection, reinforce illusory truth through repetition, help create false memories, and fuel viral redistribution across social networks, with important differences across age groups and levels of media literacy. The analysis offers useful insights for educators, researchers, policy makers, and platform designers who aim to strengthen emotional resilience, media literacy, and critical thinking, particularly among adolescents and young adults. The paper's contribution lies in an integrative psychological and neurocognitive framework that links individual affective mechanisms to the broader socio-digital dynamics of contemporary disinformation.
References
Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807
Chan, M. S., & Albarracin, D. (2023). A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8
Chen, W., Shi, J., & He, Q. (2025). China’s social fake news database release with brain structural, functional, and behavioural measures. Scientific Data, 12, Article 538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04901-4
Jeong, S.-H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x
Karanian, J. M., Thomas, A. K., & Race, E. (2024). Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 24(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01183-y
Lahti, H., Kokkonen, M., Hietajärvi, L., Lyyra, N., & Paakkari, L. (2024). Social media threats and health among adolescents: Evidence from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 18, Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00754-8
Lan, D. H., & Tung, T. M. (2024). Exploring fake news awareness and trust in the age of social media among university student TikTok users. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2302216. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2302216
Lemaire, M., Ye, S., Le Stanc, L., Borst, G., & Cassotti, M. (2025). The development of media truth discernment and fake news detection is related to the development of reasoning during adolescence. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 6854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90427-z
Maftei, A., Cojocariu, N. A., & Dumitriu, A. (2021). How do children and adolescents perceive and relate to fake news? A qualitative approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 11(1–2), 195–210.
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
Meshi, D., & Molina, M. D. (2025). Problematic social media use is associated with believing in and engaging with fake news. PLOS ONE, 20(5), Article e0321361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321361
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Schincariol, A., Otgaar, H., Greene, C. M., Murphy, G., Riesthuis, P., Mangiulli, I., & Battista, F. (2024). Fake memories: A meta-analysis on the effect of fake news on the creation of false memories and false beliefs. Memory, Mind & Media, 3, Article e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2024.14
Stefanita, O., Corbu, N., & Buturoiu, R. (2018). Fake news and the third-person effect: They are more influenced than me and you. Journal of Media Research, 11(3), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.24193/jmr.32.1
Valeanu, A., Mihai, D. P., Andrei, C., Puscasu, C., Ionica, A. M., Hinoveanu, M. I., Predoi, V. P., Bulancea, E., Chirita, C., Negres, S., & Marineci, C. D. (2024). Identification, analysis and prediction of valid and false information related to vaccines from Romanian tweets. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1330801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330801
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EIRP Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
