Considerations Regarding the Expertise of Optical Media that Contain the Results of technical Surveillance in Criminal Cases


  • Andrei Apostol Iasi Bar


expertise; technical surveillance; interceptions; altering of proof


In order for the data that results from the technical surveillance to form a veritable means of
proof, it is mandatory that such informations are not to be altered in any way and that the original support
in which the data was printed to be kept secure. In the context of a society in which technological
advancements are increasing at a rapid rate, there exists a real risk of altering such evidence. As such, it is
in the prosecution's duty to secure the data resulting from technical surveillance. If there is doubt regarding
the authenticity of such recordings, the only method to verify the reality of the data resulting from technical
surveillances is a criminalistic expertise. Such an expertise can be performed in the course of a judicial
inquiry so that the court can verify if the technical surveillance data has not been altered or manipulated in
such a way that the actions of the defendants may gain criminal connotations. The jurisprudence is not
unanimous in this regard, but if an opposite hypothesis is to be acknowledged, it would lead to absurd
situations. Rejecting an expertise proposed in order to demonstrate the authenticity or the forgery of the
data obtained through technical surveillance means convicting a person on the basis of unverified proof,
while the European Court of Human Rights claims an express a posteriori verification regarding all
evidence materials.

Author Biography

Andrei Apostol, Iasi Bar



Treatise, races, monographs

Al?moreanu, Sorin (2004). Forensics-Course notes. Babe?-Bolyai University. Law School. Cluj-Napoca.

Udroiu, M.; Sl?voiu, R. & Predescu, O. (2009). Special investigative techniques in criminal justice. Bucharest: Ed. C.H. Beck.

Tudoran, M. V. (2012). Theory and practice of judicial audio and video interceptions and recordings. Bucharest: Universul

Juridic Publishing House.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2017). The use of audio or video interceptions as evidence in criminal proceedings and the compatibility of the

regulation with European and international requirements. Cluj-Napoca: Babes-Bolyai University Press.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2014). Technical Surveillance in the new Romanian criminal procedure code. Bucharest: Ed. C. H. Beck.

Articles, notes, comments

Dâmbu, D. (2007). Interception and recording of conversations or communications. Journal of Criminal Law, no. 3/2007.

Mateu?, Gh. (2004). The Code of Criminal Procedure, the general part, in a European perspective. R. D. P. no. 1.

Gârbule?, I. & Gr?dinaru, S. (2012). The Evidential Value of Audio Recordings or Video Recordings. Juridical Current, vol

Gârbule?, I. & Gr?dinaru, S. (2012). Some remarks on the procedure for certifying interceptions in audio or video recordings

that precede their forensic expertise. Journal of Criminology, Forensics and Penology no. 1-2.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2013). Considerations regarding the interception and recording of conversations or communications performed

under Law no. 535/2004 on preventing and combating terrorism. 8th Edition EIRP Proceedings, European Integration Realities

and Perspectives.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2018). Conditions Derived from the ECHR Jurisprudence for the Effectuation of Interceptions in European

Union Member States. Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, vol 14, nr. 3.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2010). Considerations on the Interceptions and Audio-Video Recordings Related to the Convention on Human

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, Vol. 6.

Gr?dinaru, S. (2019). Observations regarding the expertise of the supports containing the results of the technical supervision

activity, R. Penalmente Relevant, no. 1.

Case law

ECHR (2008). Case Prepelita vs Moldova. Decision from 23rd September.

ECHR (2000). Case Rotaru vs. Romania. Decision from 29th March.

Romanian High Court of Justice (2010). Criminal Division. Decision from 16th February 2011, case no. 4489/1.

Web sources

Other sources

Criminalistic expert report no. 194 / 18.11.2011. Conducted by the Inter-county Criminal Expertise from Iasi from case no.

/45/2007 of the Ia?i Court of appeal.






Legal Sciences in the New Millennium